From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quezada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 28, 2021
1:20-cv-11077-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-11077-GHW

08-28-2021

JOSE QUEZADA, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL HAWAIIAN MACADAMIA NUT, INC. Defendant.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

On March 23, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to adjourn the initial pre-trial conference sine die. Dkt. No. 9. In his request, Plaintiff stated that he was “in the process of obtaining a Certificate of Default from the Clerk of the Court and will promptly be moving the Court for a Default Judgment.” Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiff has not taken any action in this case since then. Plaintiff is directed to submit a status letter to the Court no later than September 3, 2021. Plaintiff is directed to serve this order on Defendant and to retain proof of service.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quezada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 28, 2021
1:20-cv-11077-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Quezada v. Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE QUEZADA, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL HAWAIIAN MACADAMIA NUT, INC. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 28, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-11077-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2021)