From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quevedo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00090-SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-00090-SKO

12-12-2012

THOMAS QUEVEDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Sengthiene Bosavanh* SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH, ESQ. (*as authorized via email) Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney TOVA D. WOLKING Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
TOVA D. WOLKING, CSBN 259782
Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8981

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Tova.Wolking@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE

AWARD AND PAYMENT OF

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28

U.S.C. § 2412(d)


(Docs. 23, 24)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (EAJA) in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,700.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by the attorney in connection with this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, Defendant will consider any assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's atttorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, Defendant will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Plaintiff's attorney, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any such payments made shall be delivered to Sengthiene Bosavanh, Plaintiff's attorney.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's attorney may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

Plaintiff's attorney reserves the right to contend that any non-payment caused by the collection of a federal debt owed by Plaintiff violates 31 C.F.R. § 285.5(e)(5) and Morrison v. C.I.R., 565 F.3d 658, 667 (9th Cir. 2009). Nothing in this stipulation shall be construed as an admission by Plaintiff's attorney that the Defendant has the right or authority to offset the fees due and payable pursuant to this stipulation. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's attorney to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

Sengthiene Bosavanh*

SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH, ESQ.

(*as authorized via email)

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

________

TOVA D. WOLKING

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The parties' stipulated request for EAJA fees is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (Doc. 23) pursuant to the EAJA is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Quevedo v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00090-SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Quevedo v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS QUEVEDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-00090-SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)