From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen's Grant Villas v. Daniel International Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 1, 1985
286 S.C. 555 (S.C. 1985)

Opinion

22377

Heard June 7, 1985.

Decided October 1, 1985.

Andrew K. Epting, Jr. and G. Trenholm Walker, of Wise Cole, P.A., Charleston, for appellants. Thomas H. Coker, Jr., H. Donald Sellers and H. Sam Mabry, III, of Haynesworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion Johnstone, Greenville, for respondent Daniel Intern. Corp. A. Felton Jenkins, Jr., of King Spalding, Atlanta, Ga., Colden R. Battey, Jr., of Harvey Battey, Beaufort, for respondent Palmetto Dunes Resort, Inc. George E. Mullen, of McKay Mullen, Hilton Head, for respondent Palmetto Electrical Coop.


Heard June 7, 1985.

Decided Oct. 1, 1985.


Appellants, Queen's Grant Villas Horizontal Property Regimes I-V (the Regimes), brought these actions against respondents for alleged defects in the construction of the common elements of a condominum project. The lower court granted respondent's motion for summary judgment, finding the Regimes lacked standing to maintain the actions. We reverse.

A property regime has standing to bring an action for construction defects in common elements that the regime has the duty to maintain. Roundtree Villas Ass'n v. 4701 Kings Corp., 282 S.C. 415, 321 S.E.2d 46 (1984). In this case, the master deeds and the by-laws incorporated therein show that the Regime has the obligation to maintain the common elements. Should the Regime not uphold its duty to pursue a recovery for any alleged construction defects in the common elements which it maintains, it may be liable to the homeowners for its omissions.

The effect of our opinion is to overrule the Court of Appeals' decision in Dockside Ass'n v. Detyens, ___ S.C. ___, 330 S.E.2d 537 (S.C.App. 1985), which erroneously stated that a regime has no standing to maintain an action unless it owns the common elements.

Reversed and remanded.

LITTLEJOHN, C.J., and NESS, GREGORY and CHANDLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Queen's Grant Villas v. Daniel International Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 1, 1985
286 S.C. 555 (S.C. 1985)
Case details for

Queen's Grant Villas v. Daniel International Corp.

Case Details

Full title:QUEEN'S GRANT VILLAS HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIMES I-V, Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1985

Citations

286 S.C. 555 (S.C. 1985)
335 S.E.2d 365

Citing Cases

Greenstein v. Council of Unit Owners

We have found no Maryland case involving the right of individual unit owners to initiate a negligence action…

Murphy v. Yacht Cove Homeowners Assoc

This Court has addressed the question of whether a property regime has standing to sue for defects in the…