From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queens Examination Ctr., Inc. v. Ajax One Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1973
42 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

June 28, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 26, 1973, denying defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss this action for failure to serve a complaint and to discharge the mechanic's lien filed by plaintiff, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of granting the motion to dismiss unless a complaint is served within 10 days after service upon plaintiffs-respondents by defendant-appellant of a copy of the order entered herein, with notice of entry, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Service of a summons on appellant's counsel was valid service, since same was accepted by counsel, who, in turn, served a notice of appearance on behalf of appellant. While the notice of appearance was apparently not objected to or rejected, the record discloses a possible misunderstanding between the parties as to the nature and/or scope of the appearance. Under the circumstances plaintiffs should be given one final opportunity to perfect their action by service of a complaint.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Queens Examination Ctr., Inc. v. Ajax One Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1973
42 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Queens Examination Ctr., Inc. v. Ajax One Co.

Case Details

Full title:QUEENS EXAMINATION CENTER, INC., et al., Respondents, v. AJAX ONE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Bellettieri, Fonte

It is hardly uncommon for attorneys to agree to accept service on behalf of their clients. If Richman had…