From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Oct 13, 2015
479 S.W.3d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101841

10-13-2015

Donald L. Queen, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Elizabeth U. Carlyle, 6320 Brookside Plaza, # 516, Kansas City, MO 64113, for appellant. Richard A. Starnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Elizabeth U. Carlyle, 6320 Brookside Plaza, # 516, Kansas City, MO 64113, for appellant.

Richard A. Starnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Lee Queen, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals the motion court's denial of his reopened Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Queen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Oct 13, 2015
479 S.W.3d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Queen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Donald L. Queen, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Oct 13, 2015

Citations

479 S.W.3d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)