From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen v. Schuldt

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 15, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv686 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 15, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv686.

October 15, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiff Nicholas Queen, an inmate confined within the Bureau of Prisons, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. Plaintiff alleges he has been deprived of access to certain legal materials. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking leave to proceed with this lawsuit on an in forma pauperis basis.

Discussion

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prohibits prisoners from repeatedly filing frivolous or malicious complaints on an in forma pauperis basis. Section 1915(g) provides as follows:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action [in forma pauperis] . . . if the prisoner has, on three or more occasions . . . brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Prior to the date on which he filed this lawsuit, at least four lawsuits filed by plaintiff were dismissed as frivolous. The allegations set forth in plaintiff's complaint do not demonstrate that he was in "imminent danger of serious physical injury" on the date he filed his complaint. Section 1915(g) therefore bars plaintiff from proceeding further with this lawsuit on an in forma pauperis basis.

Queen v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, No. 2:04cv21 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2004) (dismissed as frivolous); Queen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:05cv2378 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2005) (dismissed as frivolous); Queen v. Chambers, No. 3:06cv615 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2006) (dismissed as frivolous); Queen v. Hoekman, No. 3:06cv1758 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2006) (dismissed as frivolous).

Conclusion

For the reasons set forth above, this lawsuit will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion.


Summaries of

Queen v. Schuldt

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 15, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv686 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Queen v. Schuldt

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS QUEEN v. M. SCHULDT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Oct 15, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv686 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 15, 2007)