From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Queen v. Barnes

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 29, 2011
1:10CV41 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 29, 2011)

Opinion

1:10CV41.

July 29, 2011


ORDER


On June 29, 2011, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed, Notice was served on the parties in this action and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Defendant filed a limited objection to one part of the Recommendation. The Plaintiff did not object.

The Court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies as discussed in the Order entered on February 16, 2011. All pending motions in the case should be and are terminated. The Defendant's motion for relief from fraudulent filings is denied without prejudice. The action should be closed. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this order.


Summaries of

Queen v. Barnes

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jul 29, 2011
1:10CV41 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Queen v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:DARNELL QUEEN, Petitioner, pro se, v. SHERIFF B.J. BARNES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jul 29, 2011

Citations

1:10CV41 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 29, 2011)