From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quarmon v. Dillman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 91 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-7261

11-24-2015

BENJAMIN K. QUARMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.

Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00210-MSD-TEM) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benjamin K. Quarmon seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Quarmon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Quarmon v. Dillman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 91 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Quarmon v. Dillman

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN K. QUARMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 91 (4th Cir. 2015)