From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quarles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
May 1, 2018
552 S.W.3d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105669

05-01-2018

Arlando QUARLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Casey A. Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Quarles appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 24.035 (2016) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).


Summaries of

Quarles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
May 1, 2018
552 S.W.3d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Quarles v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arlando QUARLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

552 S.W.3d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)