From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quarcini v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1961
178 N.E.2d 432 (N.Y. 1961)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1961

Decided October 19, 1961

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, WILLIAM S. LAWLESS, J.

Harry J. Kelly for appellant.

John R. Minicucci for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The instruction to the jury that a driver of an automobile must exercise "extreme care or caution" when driving on a street where children are playing was concededly erroneous. We affirm, however, in view of the other instructions to the jury and in view of the fact that no adequate exception was taken. The instruction in question was excepted to solely upon the ground, not borne out by the record, that there was no testimony in the case that there were any children playing in the street. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS concurs solely upon the ground that no adequate exception was taken to the instruction to the jury.


Summaries of

Quarcini v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1961
178 N.E.2d 432 (N.Y. 1961)
Case details for

Quarcini v. Blackwell

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH QUARCINI, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of ANTHONY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 1961

Citations

178 N.E.2d 432 (N.Y. 1961)
178 N.E.2d 432
221 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

Van v. Clayburn

At the request of the plaintiffs the court also charged the jury that where a motorist has reason to believe…

Hermance v. Slopey

After defining negligence, the Trial Justice stated that it may arise "from doing an act which a reasonably…