From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qualtere v. Paterson, Ridgewood & Westwood Transp. Co.

CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, PASSAIC COUNTY
Dec 23, 1931
157 A. 676 (Cir. Ct. 1931)

Opinion

12-23-1931

QUALTERE v. PATERSON, RIDGEWOOD & WESTWOOD TRANSP. CO. et al.

Ward & McGinnis, of Paterson, for plaintiff. Holm wood & Creighton, of Newark, for defendants.


Suit by Anthony Qnaltere against the Paterson, Ridgewood & Westwood Transportation Company and another. On defendants' rule to show cause after verdict for plaintiff.

Rule discharged on condition that plaintiff consent to accept a reduction, otherwise made absolute and venire facias directed to issue.

Ward & McGinnis, of Paterson, for plaintiff.

Holm wood & Creighton, of Newark, for defendants.

MACKAT, J.

A careful examination of the testimony and briefs leads me to the conclusion that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. The verdict, however, is excessive.

Admitting for the purpose of the argument that the loss of wages, medical bills, X-rays, etc., total $4,664, nevertheless plaintiff was a laborer working for different concerns whenever he could get employment, and although at that time he was earning $42 and quite often $40 a week, to-day the man is receiving $25 a week compensation for this same kind of work, providing he can find it. It appears that the plaintiff is employed in a temporary line of work, which is perhaps a little different from what he had been doing and is not so strenuous, but even if he were able to handle the old line of work the salary would not be more than what he receives at present.

Dr. Finke, after a careful and thorough examination, said there was a 70 per cent. loss of hearing in the right ear, that the bone induction or vibration was 60 per cent. bad and 40 per cent. good, and that Mr. Qualtere's equilibrium is properly and perfectly maintained. This was all the result of a very careful examination on the day of the trial and cannot be used, for the purpose of comparison, with the testimony of Dr. Markowitz, who had not examined plaintiff since May 28, 1931, a number of months before the trial.

I am of the opinion that the verdict is excessive to the extent of $5,000. If the plaintiff will Consent to accept $15,000 within 20 days from the entry of the order hereunder, the rule to show cause will be discharged; otherwise, it will be made absolute and a venire facias may issue.


Summaries of

Qualtere v. Paterson, Ridgewood & Westwood Transp. Co.

CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, PASSAIC COUNTY
Dec 23, 1931
157 A. 676 (Cir. Ct. 1931)
Case details for

Qualtere v. Paterson, Ridgewood & Westwood Transp. Co.

Case Details

Full title:QUALTERE v. PATERSON, RIDGEWOOD & WESTWOOD TRANSP. CO. et al.

Court:CIRCUIT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, PASSAIC COUNTY

Date published: Dec 23, 1931

Citations

157 A. 676 (Cir. Ct. 1931)