Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.

Full title: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. INTEL CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2021

No. 2020-1587 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1587 2020-1588 2020-1654

10-13-2021

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. INTEL CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant

Israel Sasha Mayergoyz, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Robert Breetz, David B. Cochran, David Michael Maiorana, Joseph M. Sauer, Cleveland, OH; Matthew Johnson, Joshua R. Nightingale, Pittsburgh, PA; Jennifer L. Swize, Washington, DC. James Murphy Dowd, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by David Langdon Cavanaugh, Washington, DC; Kelli Powell, Boston, MA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153.

Israel Sasha Mayergoyz, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.

Also represented by Robert Breetz, David B. Cochran, David Michael Maiorana, Joseph M. Sauer, Cleveland, OH; Matthew Johnson, Joshua R. Nightingale, Pittsburgh, PA; Jennifer L. Swize, Washington, DC.

James Murphy Dowd, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross-appellant.

Also represented by David Langdon Cavanaugh, Washington, DC; Kelli Powell, Boston, MA.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM

(Prost, Taranto, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.