From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 2, 2021
2020-1574 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1574

03-02-2021

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. INTEL CORPORATION, Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA. THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH; JOSEPH F. HAAG, Palo Alto, CA; RAUVIN A. JOHL, YVONNE S. LEE, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01261, IPR2018-01293, IPR2018-01295, IPR2018-01344, IPR2018-01346.

JUDGMENT

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA. THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH; JOSEPH F. HAAG, Palo Alto, CA; RAUVIN A. JOHL, YVONNE S. LEE, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 2, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 2, 2021
2020-1574 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. INTEL CORPORATION, Appellee ANDREW…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 2021

Citations

2020-1574 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2021)