From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2021
2020-1560 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1560

02-09-2021

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL. LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ASHLEY BOLT, Atlanta, GA; ROBERT COURTNEY, Minneapolis, MN. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01249.

JUDGMENT

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL. LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ASHLEY BOLT, Atlanta, GA; ROBERT COURTNEY, Minneapolis, MN. MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 9, 2021
2020-1560 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2021

Citations

2020-1560 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2021)