From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quair v. Gertz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2015
2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)

Opinion


SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR., Plaintiff, v. GERTZ, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 26, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         On February 10, 2015, plaintiff was granted a thirty-day extension of time to file and serve an amended complaint. (ECF No. 82.) Subsequently, plaintiff's consolidated actions were set for a settlement conference on June 2, 2015. (ECF No. 84.) Before the court is plaintiff's request to vacate the February 10, 2015 order, so that he will not need to file an amended complaint prior to settlement talks. (ECF No. 86.) The court will grant this request and revisit the timing of any amended complaint after the settlement conference, if necessary.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 86) is granted, and the deadline for filing an amended complaint (ECF No. 82) is hereby vacated.


Summaries of

Quair v. Gertz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2015
2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Quair v. Gertz

Case Details

Full title:SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR., Plaintiff, v. GERTZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 26, 2015

Citations

2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)