From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

QUADRANT EPP USA, INC. v. MENASHA CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-356 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)

Summary

finding that alleged failure to comply with NFPA 654 did not violate the general duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act because NFPA has not been adopted by Congress of the Secretary of Labor as a standard for OSHA enforcement and, therefore, does not have the force of law

Summary of this case from Yates v. City of Barberton

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-356.

September 30, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2010, after a bench trial in this action and careful review of the transcripts and the briefs of the parties, and in accordance with my findings of fact and conclusions of law, judgment is hereby entered on behalf of the defendant and against the plaintiffs.


Summaries of

QUADRANT EPP USA, INC. v. MENASHA CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-356 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)

finding that alleged failure to comply with NFPA 654 did not violate the general duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act because NFPA has not been adopted by Congress of the Secretary of Labor as a standard for OSHA enforcement and, therefore, does not have the force of law

Summary of this case from Yates v. City of Barberton
Case details for

QUADRANT EPP USA, INC. v. MENASHA CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:QUADRANT EPP USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. MENASHA CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-356 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Yates v. City of Barberton

But there are no allegations from which this Court may infer that those standards have been adopted by…

Sarno Realty, Inc. v. Selective Ins. Co. of the Se.

Plaintiffs cite to five cases in which courts have apparently discussed the NFPA code in connection with…