From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

QT Inc. v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Dec 22, 2006
No. 05 C 6387 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 22, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05 C 6387.

December 22, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendants have moved for partial summary judgment on plaintiff's negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims. Plaintiff now moves to postpone consideration of the pending partial summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f). It wants discovery.

But discovery of what? Plaintiff indicates that it hopes something will turn up, but it does not specify what that "something" might be. We believe the proper course is to have plaintiff respond to defendants' motion by January 19, 2007, and as part of that response specify what facts, if any, need to be determined — and have not been determined — before any ruling on the legal positions defendants have advanced. Defendants' reply to be filed by February 2, 2007.


Summaries of

QT Inc. v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Dec 22, 2006
No. 05 C 6387 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 22, 2006)
Case details for

QT Inc. v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

Case Details

Full title:QT INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2006

Citations

No. 05 C 6387 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 22, 2006)