From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qorrolli v. Metro. Dental Assocs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
18cv6836 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

18cv6836 (DLC)

11-30-2021

FORTESA QORROLLI, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN DENTAL ASSOCIATES, D.D.S. - 22 5 BROADWAY, P.C. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, DISTRICT JUDGE.

On June 10, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. On the same day, Defendants' counsel also filed a declaration in support of the motion purporting to attach deposition transcripts of the plaintiff, defendant Mario Orantes, and defendant Dr. Paul Cohen. Those transcripts, however, were not filed on the docket. The defendants' brief in support of the motion relied on several pages of the plaintiff's deposition testimony.

On July 16, the plaintiff filed opposition and included as exhibits an excerpt of the plaintiff's deposition transcript, as well as the full deposition transcripts of Orantes and Dr. Cohen. The motion became fully submitted on July 30. On September 9, the case was reassigned to this Court. It is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant shall file by Thursday, December 2 the complete deposition transcript of the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Qorrolli v. Metro. Dental Assocs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
18cv6836 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Qorrolli v. Metro. Dental Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:FORTESA QORROLLI, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN DENTAL ASSOCIATES, D.D.S. …

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

18cv6836 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)