From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Qiqiu Sun v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 2, 2022
21 Civ. 10202 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 10202 (LGS)

03-02-2022

QIQIU SUN, Petitioner, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ET AL., Respondents.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge

WHEREAS, Petitioner initiated this case with a petition in the nature of mandamus on December 1, 2021, and requested summonses on January 12, 2022, and February 23, 2022.

WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides, “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.”

WHEREAS, ninety days have passed since Petitioner filed this case, and Petitioner has not filed proof of service on the docket. It is hereby

ORDERED that by March 4, 2022, Petitioner shall file a letter stating whether Respondents have been served and if not, whether any good cause exists for an extension of time to serve Respondents. If Petitioner has served Respondents, Petitioner shall file proof of service on the docket. Petitioner is advised that failure to comply with the Federal Rules and Court-ordered deadlines may result in sanctions, including dismissal.


Summaries of

Qiqiu Sun v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 2, 2022
21 Civ. 10202 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Qiqiu Sun v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:QIQIU SUN, Petitioner, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ET AL., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 10202 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022)