QFO Labs, Inc. v. Parrot S.A.

Full title: QFO LABS, INC., Appellant v. PARROT S.A., PARROT DRONES S.A.S., PARROT…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

2018-1663 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1663 2018-1664

04-03-2019

QFO LABS, INC., Appellant v. PARROT S.A., PARROT DRONES S.A.S., PARROT, INC., Appellees

BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PHILLIP A. COLE, Lommen Abdo, Minneapolis, MN; CHAZ DE LA GARZA, Law Offices of Chaz De La Garza, Minneapolis, MN; CHARLES A. LEMAIRE, Lemaire Patent Law Firm PLLC, Burnsville, MN. MATTHEW A. TRAUPMAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also represented by JAMES M. GLASS; ARCHITH RAMKUMAR, Washington, DC.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01550, IPR2016-01559.

JUDGMENT

BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PHILLIP A. COLE, Lommen Abdo, Minneapolis, MN; CHAZ DE LA GARZA, Law Offices of Chaz De La Garza, Minneapolis, MN; CHARLES A. LEMAIRE, Lemaire Patent Law Firm PLLC, Burnsville, MN. MATTHEW A. TRAUPMAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also represented by JAMES M. GLASS; ARCHITH RAMKUMAR, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 3, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court