QFA ROYALTIES LLC v. SIDDIQI

Full title: QFA ROYALTIES LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAVAD SIDDIQI, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 13, 2009

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00628-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 13, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00628-PAB-BNB.

August 13, 2009

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

On May 15, 2009, the parties reported that they had executed a settlement agreement resolving this dispute. They also reported that "[u]nder the terms of the settlement agreement, Defendants agreed to meet certain conditions within ten days." Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Vacate [etc.] [Doc. # 21] at ¶ 7. In a Status Report [Doc. # 25] filed June 24, 2009, the plaintiffs stated that they had been informed by the defendants that all conditions of the settlement agreement had been satisfied; the plaintiffs stated that they would schedule an inspection "within the next few days" to confirm compliance; and that in light of the representation of compliance, "Quiznos hopes this matter will be finally resolved within the next few days." Status Report [Doc. # 25] at ¶¶ 9-10.

I held a status conference this morning. The parties informed me that only one matter of compliance remains at issue.

IT IS ORDERED that on or before September 15, 2009, the parties shall file either (1) a motion to dismiss with prejudice, (2) a motion to enforce the settlement, or (3) a motion to schedule pretrial matters.