Opinion
2:23-cv-00052-RFB-VCF
02-09-2023
Omar Qazi Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, State of Nevada, Department of Corrections, Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Defendants.
JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney District of Nevada STEPHEN R. HANSON II Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America MICHAEL P. BALABAN Law Offices of Michael P. Balaban Michael P. Balaban Attorney for Plaintiff NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Douglas Rands Deputy Nevada Attorney General
JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney District of Nevada STEPHEN R. HANSON II Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America
MICHAEL P. BALABAN Law Offices of Michael P. Balaban Michael P. Balaban Attorney for Plaintiff NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Douglas Rands Deputy Nevada Attorney General
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' ANSWERING DEADLINE (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff Omar Qazi, Defendant United States of America, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (“United States”), and Defendant State of Nevada, Department of Corrections (“State of Nevada”) stipulate that the Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint will be March 6, 2023, which is 60 days after the United States removed this action to federal court. The purpose of the stipulation is to allow the United States and the State of Nevada adequate time to investigate this case before answering or otherwise responding to the complaint. In addition, the parties request a response date that applies to both the United States and State of Nevada so that the responses are not staggered. This is the parties' first stipulation to extend time for the Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.
The parties further stipulate that if the Defendants file motions to dismiss this case, Plaintiff shall have until April 17, 2023, to respond to such motions so that Plaintiff will have adequate time to research the legal issues and because Plaintiff's counsel has a trial scheduled for the end of March that may interfere with responding to such motions.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED: