From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pytynia v. United States, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 5, 2022
6:22-cv-1999-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

6:22-cv-1999-CEM-LHP

12-05-2022

JANET-MONICA PYTYNIA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, INC., DUKE ENERGY, DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC and JANET YELLEN, Defendants


ORDER TO STRIKE

LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This cause comes before the Court on review of Plaintiff's “Prime Creditor Claim to Right of Subrogation and Demand for Remedy/Restitution.” Doc. No. 9. Upon review, the filing is ORDERED stricken for failure to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rule 1.08's format requirements, Local Rule 3.01(a)'s page limitations, and Local Rule 3.01(g)'s conferral requirements. Any renewed filings must comply with all applicable rules.

Plaintiff is cautioned that although she proceeds pro se, all filings in this matter must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules of this Court, and Court Orders. See Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 836 (11th Cir. 1989) (A pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). See also Doc. No. 4.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pytynia v. United States, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 5, 2022
6:22-cv-1999-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Pytynia v. United States, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JANET-MONICA PYTYNIA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, INC., DUKE ENERGY, DUKE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

6:22-cv-1999-CEM-LHP (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2022)