From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pyka v. Georgen

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 15, 2016
NO. 03-16-00312-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 03-16-00312-CV

07-15-2016

Catherine Sue Pyka and Theresa Catherine Pyka, Appellant v. Darlene Marie Georgen, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. C2014-0290B, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDINGMEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants stated in their notice of appeal that the order appealed from is the trial court's denial of a motion to reconsider. On June 7, 2016, this Court notified appellants that the trial court's ruling is not a final or otherwise appealable order. This Court's jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders signed by the trial court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, .014; see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). This Court cautioned appellants that a failure to inform us by June 17 of the basis on which we might have jurisdiction over the case could result in dismissal of the case for want of jurisdiction. To date no response has been received from appellants. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 15, 2016


Summaries of

Pyka v. Georgen

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 15, 2016
NO. 03-16-00312-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Pyka v. Georgen

Case Details

Full title:Catherine Sue Pyka and Theresa Catherine Pyka, Appellant v. Darlene Marie…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 15, 2016

Citations

NO. 03-16-00312-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2016)