From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putzer v. Donnelly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 10, 2009
3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2009)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC.

August 10, 2009


ORDER


Before the court is Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal/Motion to Reconsider (#101) Judge Cooke's rulings on items 3 and 10 of the March 26, 2009, Minutes of Proceedings (#98). Defendants filed their Response to Motion to Reconsider/Motion to Strike (#106).

Refers to this court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's opposition, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

The Magistrate Judge's Order (#98) will, therefore, be sustained. Plaintiff's motion (#101) is denied and Defendants' Motion to Strike (#106) is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Putzer v. Donnelly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 10, 2009
3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Putzer v. Donnelly

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PUTZER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DONNELLY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 10, 2009

Citations

3:07-cv-00620-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2009)