From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Putnam v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

April, 1933.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint, with costs. In our opinion the finding of the learned referee that the mortgage in question was executed and delivered upon condition that the Lafayette Trust Company should remain open is against the weight of the evidence. To the contrary, the evidence shows that the said mortgage was delivered without condition. We are also of opinion that there was ample consideration to support the mortgage. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings will be made in support thereof. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Putnam v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Putnam v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN B. PUTNAM, Appellant, v. JOHN G. JENKINS and MARY E. JENKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)