From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pushkin v. Nussbaum

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 22, 2011
10 Civ. 9212 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

10 Civ. 9212 (KBF).

November 22, 2011.


ORDER


On November 4, 2011, the Honorable Debra Freeman, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending the denial of Plaintiff David Pushkin's motion for a default judgment against defendants GEICO, Lisa Ardron, Gina Fuge, Dominic Spaventa, Paul Feldmann, and Premier Prizm Solutions, LLC.

On November 16, 2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the Report. Defendants submitted a letter on November 18, 2011, requesting that the Court affirm the Report and Recommendation. The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's objections thereto. Having done so, the Court finds itself in complete agreement with the well-reasoned Report.

Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, denies Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendants GEICO, Lisa Ardron, Gina Fuge, Dominic Spaventa, Paul Feldmann, and Premier Prizm Solutions, LLC.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close document number 149 on the docket of the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pushkin v. Nussbaum

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 22, 2011
10 Civ. 9212 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Pushkin v. Nussbaum

Case Details

Full title:PUSHKIN v. NUSSBAUM

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

10 Civ. 9212 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 2011)