Purzel Video GmbH v. Doe

Full title: PURZEL VIDEO GmbH, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-39, Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00598-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00598-WYD-MEH

04-01-2013

PURZEL VIDEO GmbH, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-39, Defendants.

MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Pearson

FTR - Courtroom A501

Paul Lesko

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING

Court in session: 11:02 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearance of counsel by telephone.

Discussion regarding Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 9, filed 3/12/13).

ORDERED: For reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference is DENIED without prejudice. Counsel is granted to re-file the motion in another form at the proper time.

Court in recess: 11:15 a.m. (Hearing concluded)
Total time in court: 0:13

To obtain a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)825-6119.