From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purvis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 30, 1979
370 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

Nos. 78-974, 78-975.

March 23, 1979. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, William A. Norris, Jr., J.

J. Hardin Peterson, Jr. of Peterson, Myers, Craig, Crews, Brandon Mann, and Clinton A. Curtis, Lakeland, for appellant Purvis.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant Prescott.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellants were convicted of (1) burglary, (2) grand larceny, (3) possession of more than five grams of marijuana, and (4) possession of more than a hundred pounds of marijuana with intent to sell. Appellants were sentenced to five-years imprisonment on each of the first three convictions, and fifteen years on the fourth. The first three sentences were to run consecutively, and the sentence on the fourth conviction was to run concurrently to the sentences on the first three.

Appellants attack their convictions on several grounds. We have examined their contentions carefully, and find only one point which merits discussion. Appellants contend that they should not have been sentenced for possession of more than a hundred pounds of marijuana with intent to sell and possession of more than five grams, since both charges were based on possession of the same marijuana. We agree.

It was necessary for the state to establish that appellants possessed more than five grams of marijuana in order to show that they possessed over a hundred pounds with intent to sell. Therefore, possession of more than five grams was a category three lesser-included offense under Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1968). A defendant cannot be sentenced for a lesser-included offense as well as the greater offense. § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (1977); Ennis v. State, 364 So.2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Accordingly, we vacate each appellant's conviction and sentence for possession of more than five grams of marijuana. Otherwise, we affirm.

SCHEB, Acting C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Purvis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 30, 1979
370 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Purvis v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL A. PURVIS AND JAMES ROBERT PRESCOTT, JR., APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 30, 1979

Citations

370 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Shad v. State

Since this charge is a lesser-included offense of attempted possession of more than one hundred pounds of…

McClendon v. State

Several cases decided since the effective date of the new "single transaction" statute, Section 775.021(4),…