From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purvis v. Blitz USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Civil No. 7:11-CV-111 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 7:11-CV-111 (HL)

06-21-2012

SHERRI PURVIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN FOR JAMES C. PURVIS, Plaintiff, v. BLITZ USA, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012, the Court held a telephone conference call to discuss Plaintiff's pending Motion to Compel (Doc. 31). During the call, the parties informed the Court that the issues presented in the Motion had been resolved. The parties agreed that Defendants would supplement their initial disclosures to satisfy Plaintiff's requests. Plaintiff's counsel noted that there were no further issues to address at the time, but counsel reserved the right to object after the supplemental disclosures were made.

Based on the agreement between the parties, the Motion to Compel is moot. The parties are directed to inform the Court if any additional discovery disputes arise in this course of this litigation.

________________________

HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
ebr


Summaries of

Purvis v. Blitz USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 21, 2012
Civil No. 7:11-CV-111 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Purvis v. Blitz USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHERRI PURVIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN FOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 7:11-CV-111 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 21, 2012)