Opinion
No. 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB
05-11-2017
MICHAEL PURTUE, Plaintiff, v. G. EBERLE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
(Doc. Nos. 37, 41)
Plaintiff Michael Purtue is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 4, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day period has expired and no objections to the findings and recommendations were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the undersigned concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. /////
Accordingly,
1. The findings and recommendations filed on January 4, 2017 (Doc. No. 41) are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction filed on December 22, 2016 (Doc. No. 37) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 11 , 2017
/s/_________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE