Purser v. U.S. Haskell Indian Nations University

Full title: HEATHER PURSER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HASKELL INDIAN…

Court: United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Mar 7, 2007

Case No. 06-2133-CM (D. Kan. Mar. 7, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 06-2133-CM.

March 7, 2007

ORDER

K. SEBELIUS, Magistrate Judge

This matter comes before the court upon defendant's Motion to Deny as Moot (Doc. 45) defendant's combined Motion to File Motion to Compel Out of Time; Motion to Compel; and Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Doc. 31).

On February 2, 2007, defendant filed its motion (Doc. 31) seeking to file its motion to compel out of time, compel responses to certain interrogatories, and to amend the scheduling order. Subsequent to this filing, plaintiff sufficiently responded to defendant's discovery request and the court entered an order extending the discovery deadline (Doc. 44). Thus, "[i]n light of these developments, the Defendant's motion [(Doc. 31)] is now moot."¹

1 Motion (Doc. 45) at p. 1.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion (Doc. 45) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's combined motion to File Motion to Compel Out of Time; Motion to Compel; and Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Doc. 31) is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.