From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pure Oil Company v. Rosengarten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

June, 1929.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff made out a prima facie case to entitle it to specific performance, and that the complaint was, under the circumstances, improperly dismissed on the merits. Rich, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Pure Oil Company v. Rosengarten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Pure Oil Company v. Rosengarten

Case Details

Full title:THE PURE OIL COMPANY, Appellant, v. SARAH ROSENGARTEN and WILLIAM J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)