Purdue v. Harrington

Full title: MARQUIS PURDUE, Petitioner, v. K. HARRINGTON, Warden, et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

CV 12-7573-RGK (SP) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

MARQUIS PURDUE, Petitioner, v. K. HARRINGTON, Warden, et al., Respondents. No. CV 12-7573-RGK (SP) United States District Court, C.D. California. February 21, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted, and Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.