From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Purcell v. Black

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 5, 1993
614 A.2d 588 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)

Opinion

(10874)

Argued December 9, 1992

Decision released January 5, 1993

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident that allegedly resulted from the defendants' negligence, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk and tried to the jury before Mottolese, J., verdict for the defendants; thereafter, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict and rendered judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Ridgely W. Brown, with whom, on the brief, was Heather M. Brown, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Dion W. Moore, for the appellee (named defendant).

Kenneth B. Povodator, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Daniel M. McCabe, corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant city of Stamford et al.).


Summaries of

Purcell v. Black

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 5, 1993
614 A.2d 588 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)
Case details for

Purcell v. Black

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH P. PURCELL v. ORVEL BLACK ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 5, 1993

Citations

614 A.2d 588 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)
29 Conn. App. 925