Cf. Morse v. Levine, No. 19 Civ. 6711 (GHW) (SN), 2019 WL 7494619, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2019) ("The parties' activity — such as Petitioners' filing a demand to arbitrate and Respondent's engagement with the AAA over the applicable rules — demonstrates both parties' intent to arbitrate issues relating to the Agreement."), report and recommendation adopted, No. 19 Civ. 6711 (GHW), 2020 WL 85410 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2020); Pupiales v. BLDG Mgmt. Co., 2 N.Y.S.3d 798, 798-99 (1st Dep't 2015) (finding that plaintiff waived any objection to arbitration where her union commenced arbitration proceedings on her behalf). As such, even if Respondent did not enter into the Solution Channel Agreement when it was distributed to Petitioner's employees via the Solution Channel Announcement on October 6, 2017, she later impliedly consented to arbitration under the terms of that agreement.