From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puma v. Dream Team Partners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2021
19-CV-9824 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-9824 (RA)

05-28-2021

GERMAN PUMA, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DREAM TEAM PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

:

It has been reported to the Court that the parties, following a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave, have reached an agreement to resolve this wage-and-hour action. No later than June 28, 2021 the parties shall take one of the following three actions:

1. Consent to conducting all further proceedings before Judge Cave by completing the following form: http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge. As the form indicates, no adverse substantive consequences will arise if the parties choose not to proceed before Judge Cave.

2. Submit a stipulation or notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

3. Submit a joint letter setting forth their views as to why their settlement is fair and reasonable and should be approved, accompanied by all necessary supporting materials, including contemporaneous billing records for the attorney's fees and costs provided for in the settlement agreement. In light of the presumption of public
access attaching to "judicial documents," see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006), the parties are advised that materials on which the Court relies in making its fairness determination will be placed on the public docket, see Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., No. 11-CV-5917 (JMF), 2012 WL 2700381, at *3-7 (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2012).

The parties are also advised that the Court will not approve of settlement agreements in which:

(a) Plaintiffs "waive practically any possible claim against the defendants, including unknown claims and claims that have no relationship whatsoever to wage-and-hour issues," Gurung v. White Way Threading LLC, 226 F. Supp. 3d 226, 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted); and

(b) Plaintiffs are "bar[red] from making any negative statement about the defendants," unless the settlement agreement "include[s] a carve-out for truthful statements about [P]laintiffs' experience litigating their case," Lazaro-Garcia v. Sengupta Food Servs., No. 15 Civ. 4259 (RA), 2015 WL 9162701, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2021

New York, New York

/s/_________

Ronnie Abrams

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Puma v. Dream Team Partners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2021
19-CV-9824 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Puma v. Dream Team Partners

Case Details

Full title:GERMAN PUMA, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 28, 2021

Citations

19-CV-9824 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2021)