From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulse Techs. Inc. v. Notaro

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2012
No. 626 MAL 2011 (Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. 626 MAL 2011

01-25-2012

PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner v. PETER NOTARO AND MK PRECISION LLC, Respondents


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does a Court act improperly to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement solely because the restrictive covenant was not expressly referenced in a non-binding initial offer letter, and the offer letter conditioned employment on the execution of the employment agreement?


Summaries of

Pulse Techs. Inc. v. Notaro

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2012
No. 626 MAL 2011 (Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Pulse Techs. Inc. v. Notaro

Case Details

Full title:PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner v. PETER NOTARO AND MK PRECISION LLC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

No. 626 MAL 2011 (Pa. Jan. 25, 2012)