Opinion
2012-01-27
PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner v. Peter NOTARO and MK Precision LLC, Respondents.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 626 MAL 2011.
Prior report: Pa.Super., 30 A.3d 545.
AMENDED ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does a Court act improperly by refusing to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement solely because the restrictive covenant was not expressly referenced in a non-binding initial offer letter, and the offer letter conditioned employment on the execution of the employment agreement?