From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 4, 1985
482 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1985)

Opinion

No. 66198.

November 4, 1985.

District Court of Appeal; 1st District — No. AU-62.


Upon consideration of the Motion for Rehearing filed by attorney for petitioner and the Motion for Rehearing and Clarification filed by attorneys for Amicus Curiae, Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, and responses thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that said Motions be and the same are hereby denied.


OVERTON, J., I find nothing new in the petition for rehearing; consequently, I am bound to deny rehearing even though I disagree with the majority opinion and would allow a claim to be brought within the four-year statute of limitations period if the cause of action accrued within the twelve-year period of the statute of repose.

ADKINS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 4, 1985
482 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1985)
Case details for

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD PULLUM, PETITIONER, v. CINCINNATI, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 4, 1985

Citations

482 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1985)