From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullo v. Artrip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-03203.

February 22, 2005.

In an action to compel the determination of claims to real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Carey, J.), dated March 3, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed their counterclaim seeking title to certain real property by adverse possession.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants' evidence at trial failed to establish that they obtained title by adverse possession to any of the real property at issue ( see RPAPL 522; Ray v. Beacon Hudson Mtn. Corp., 88 NY2d 154; Seisser v. Eglin, 7 AD3d 505; Rowland v. Crystal Bay Constr., 301 AD2d 585; Giannone v. Trotwood Corp., 266 AD2d 430). Thus, their counterclaim was properly dismissed.


Summaries of

Pullo v. Artrip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Pullo v. Artrip

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL PULLO et al., Respondents, v. JAMES ARTRIP et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 690