From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulliam v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502417.

November 21, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Dwayne Pulliam, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possession of contraband and possession of unauthorized organizational materials. On administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued and we now confirm.

The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing ( see Matter of Fontaine v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 AD3d 1113, 1113-1114, appeal dismissed 8 NY3d 943). Petitioner's claim that the correction officers planted some of the items found in his cell, along with his retaliation defense, created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Hamilton v Selsky, 13 AD3d 844, 845, lv denied 5 NY3d 704). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and that the determination did not flow from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Dolan v Goord, 41 AD3d 1119, 1119). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the cell search was not appropriately memorialized, the Hearing Officer should have recused himself and the hearing transcript is deficient, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Pulliam v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Pulliam v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DWAYNE PULLIAM, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1158 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9175
844 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Kearney v. Fischer

47 AD3d 1102, 1102-1103). Petitioner's claim that the weapons were "planted" inside the keyboard by…

Batts v. Fischer

Petitioner's administrative appeal was unsuccessful, prompting him to commence this proceeding pursuant to…