From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullett v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
No. CIV S 07-1755 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S 07-1755 FCD DAD P.

February 20, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the required filing fee.

In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered in the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Pullett v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
No. CIV S 07-1755 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Pullett v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:DELL PULLETT, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S 07-1755 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)