From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pullano v. CCDC GUARD#8170

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 21, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-00335-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-00335-KJD-VCF.

October 21, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (#102). Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Leavitt's Order (#14) denying Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel.

Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court will reconsider a magistrate judge's order that is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Plaintiff fails to point to any authority or facts showing that Judge Leavitt's Order was contrary to law or was clearly erroneous. Judge Leavitt's order left open the possibility that counsel could be appointed after Defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint. If Plaintiff believes that this case warrants appointment of counsel, he should file another motion seeking appointment of counsel.

This case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/17/2011. (#116.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (#102) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Pullano v. CCDC GUARD#8170

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 21, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-00335-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Pullano v. CCDC GUARD#8170

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS J. PULLANO, Plaintiff, v. CCDC GUARD#8170, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-00335-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2011)