From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulizzi v. Oghia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1999
262 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 7, 1999

June 21, 1999

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Hady G. Oghia appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Levine, J.), dated April 13, 1998, as only conditionally granted his motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Dwyer Taglia, New York, N.Y. (Peter R. Taglia of counsel), for appellant.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a matter of discretion with the court ( see, Herrera v. City of New York, 238 A.D.2d 475). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in only conditionally granting the appellant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126.


Summaries of

Pulizzi v. Oghia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1999
262 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Pulizzi v. Oghia

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT PULIZZI, etc., et al., respondents, v. HADY G. OGHIA, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 349