From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulizzano v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0503 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0503 WBS CKD P

07-15-2021

JAMES JOSEPH PULIZZANO, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 7, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Pulizzano v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 15, 2021
2:21-cv-0503 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Pulizzano v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JOSEPH PULIZZANO, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0503 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2021)