From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulichene v. Nightingale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

December, 1935.

Present — Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P.J., not voting.


Three actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. Appeal by defendant Paul Pulichene from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Pulichene v. Nightingale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Pulichene v. Nightingale

Case Details

Full title:JACK PULICHENE, Respondent, v. FRANK NIGHTINGALE, ROSE MARIE STODDARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)