From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pule v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 1, 2011
No. CV 09-1118-AHM (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 09-1118-AHM (AGR)

12-01-2011

FRANKIE PULE, Petitioner, v. A NTHO NY HE DGPETH, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

A. HOWARD MATZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pule v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 1, 2011
No. CV 09-1118-AHM (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Pule v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE PULE, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 1, 2011

Citations

No. CV 09-1118-AHM (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2011)