From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puhalla v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jul 30, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1381 MLB (D. Kan. Jul. 30, 2008)

Opinion

ACTION No. 07-1381 MLB.

July 30, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Puhalla v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jul 30, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1381 MLB (D. Kan. Jul. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Puhalla v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE PUHALLA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jul 30, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 07-1381 MLB (D. Kan. Jul. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Fortner v. Astrue

"Because the listed impairments, if met, operate to cut off further inquiry, they should not be read…