Opinion
(6408)
Submitted on briefs September 20, 1988
Decision released October 11, 1988
Action to establish the boundaries of a certain right of way, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield and referred to Hon. Milton Belinkie, state trial referee; judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Salvatore A. Maresca, Jr., filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).
Patricia A. Puglio, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff), filed a brief.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants claim that the court erred in overruling objections to testimony and in denying their motion for judgment for failure of the plaintiff to produce expert testimony. We find no error.
When error is claimed in rulings such as those complained of, the brief or appendix must include the pertinent motion, if it does not appear in the printed record; the question; the objection and the ground on which it was based; the ground on which the evidence was claimed to be admissible; the answer, if any; the ruling; and any exception. Practice Book 4065(d)(3). This rule has not been complied with and we will not consider the claims asserted. Henry v. Klein, 15 Conn. App. 496, 500, 545 A.2d 575 (1988).